When
we decide to order a diagnostic test, we want to know which test (or tests) will
best help us rule-in or rule-out disease in our patient. In the language of clinical epidemiology, we take our initial
assessment of the likelihood of disease (“pre-test probability”), do a test
to help us shift our suspicion one way or the other, and then determine a final
assessment of the likelihood of disease (“post-test probability”).
Take a look at the diagram below, which graphically illustrates this
process of “revising the probability of disease”.

Likelihood
ratios tell us how much we should shift our suspicion for a particular
test result. Because tests can be positive or negative, there are at least two
likelihood ratios for each test. The
“positive likelihood ratio” (LR+) tells us how much to increase the
probability of disease if the test is positive, while the “negative likelihood
ratio” (LR-) tells us how much to decrease it if the test is negative.
The formula for calculating the likelihood ratio is:
probability of an individual with
the condition having the test result
LR =
probability of an individual without
the condition having the test result
Thus,
the positive and likelihood ratio are:
probability of an individual with
the condition having a positive test
LR+
= probability
of an individual without the
condition having a positive test
probability of an
individual with the condition having
a negative test
LR- =
probability of an individual without
the condition having a negative test
You
can also define the LR+ and LR- in terms of sensitivity and specificity:
LR+
= sensitivity / (1-specificity)
LR-
= (1-sensitivity) / specificity
Let’s
consider an example:
In
a study of the ability of rapid antigen tests to diagnose strep pharyngitis, 90%
of patients with strep pharyngitis have a positive rapid antigen test, while
only 5% of those without strep pharyngitis have a positive test.
The LR+ for the ability of rapid antigen tests to diagnose strep
pharyngitis is:
LR+ = 90% / (100%-95%) = 90% / 5% = 18
Don't get too caught up in the calculations. the important thing is to understand the meaning of a likelihood ratio. They have unique properties that make them particularly relevant to clinicians:
The LR- corresponds to the clinical concept of "ruling-out disease"
The LR+ and LR- don't change as the underlying probability of disease changes (predictive values do change, as you just learned)
LR's using multiple "levels" of positive (i.e. not just a simple yes/no or positive/negative result) provide much richer, more useful information to you as a clinician.
Interpreting
likelihood ratios: general guidelines
The
first thing to realize about LR’s is that an LR > 1 indicates an increased
probability that the target disorder is present, and an LR < 1 indicates a
decreased probability that the target disorder is present. The following
are general guidelines, which must be correlated with the clinical scenario:
|
LR |
Interpretation |
|
>
10 |
Large
and often conclusive increase in the likelihood of disease |
|
5
- 10 |
Moderate
increase in the likelihood of disease |
|
2
- 5 |
Small
increase in the likelihood of disease |
|
1
- 2 |
Minimal
increase in the likelihood of disease |
|
1 |
No
change in the likelihood of disease |
|
0.5
- 1.0 |
Minimal
decrease in the likelihood of disease |
|
0.2
- 0.5 |
Small
decrease in the likelihood of disease |
|
0.1
- 0.2 |
Moderate
decrease in the likelihood of disease |
|
<
0.1 |
Large
and often conclusive decrease in the likelihood of disease |
Take
a look at a collection
of likelihood ratios for common tests, provided by the folks at the Cochrane
Centre in Oxford, England.
The
decision to order a test is also based on our initial assessment of the
likelihood of the target disorder, and how important it is to rule-in or
rule-out disease. For example, a chest x-ray might have a good likelihood ratio
for pneumonia. But if you believe a patient has a simple cold, this test, no
matter how good the LR, probably shouldn’t be ordered.
It is sometimes helpful to be able to calculate the exact probability of
disease given a positive or negative test.
We saw that this is next to impossible using sensitivity and specificity
at the bedside (unless you can do Bayes’ Theorem in your head!).
Next, we’ll learn how we can use likelihood ratios to quickly estimate
the probability of disease in our patients.